{"id":8354,"date":"2026-09-30T15:43:32","date_gmt":"2026-09-30T21:43:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/camposlawfirm.com\/"},"modified":"2026-09-30T15:43:32","modified_gmt":"2026-09-30T21:43:32","slug":"supreme-court-lets-third-country-deportations-resume-what-changes-for-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/camposlawfirm.com\/es\/supreme-court-lets-third-country-deportations-resume-what-changes-for-you\/","title":{"rendered":"El Tribunal Supremo autoriza la reanudaci\u00f3n de las deportaciones a terceros pa\u00edses: \u00bfqu\u00e9 cambia para ti?"},"content":{"rendered":"

At Campos Law Firm, we closely monitor developments in U.S. immigration policy to protect our clients’ rights and future. On September 29, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the government’s emergency request and put on hold the ruling that had blocked third-country deportations<\/strong>, meaning removals to nations that are not the person’s country of origin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The order does not decide whether the policy is lawful. It only lets the government keep using it while the case moves forward. Below, we explain what we know, what we don’t, and what you can do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What Did the Supreme Court Decide?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The vote was 6-3<\/strong>. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. “In matters of life and death, it is best to proceed with caution. In this case, the Government took the opposite approach,” Sotomayor wrote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

El caso es DHS v. D.V.D.<\/em> The Court agreed to hear oral arguments in Diciembre de 2026<\/strong> and will issue a final decision afterward. Until then, the stay remains in place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This has happened before. In June 2025, the Court stayed an earlier preliminary order from the same trial court in this litigation, which allowed the program to expand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What Had Judge Brian Murphy Ordered?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In February 2026, U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy in Massachusetts found that the policy failed to satisfy due process<\/strong>. He ordered the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to give people clear notice before sending them to a third country and a meaningful chance to say they would face persecution or torture there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On September 18, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit largely upheld that ruling. A few days later it clarified its order, forcing the cancellation of a flight carrying about 70 personas<\/strong> from Alexandria, Louisiana, to Burundi, Rwanda, and the Central African Republic. The government then turned to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Seg\u00fan Reuters, more than 25,000 migrants have been sent to 29 countries<\/strong> under the policy since it was expanded in 2025. Most went to Mexico; others went to South Sudan, Uganda, Liberia, Equatorial Guinea, and the Central African Republic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/path><\/g><\/g><\/g><\/svg><\/div>
Ver esta publicaci\u00f3n en Instagram<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/a>

Una publicaci\u00f3n compartida por camposlawfirmpllc (@camposlawfirmpllc)<\/a><\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n